PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2011Journal of Public Health1,278 citations

'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review

View Full Paper
RARebecca ArmstrongBHBelinda J. HallJDJodie Doyle

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively.A crucial step in the systematic review process is to thoroughly define the scope of the research question.This requires an understanding of existing literature, including gaps and uncertainties, clarification of definitions related to the research question and an understanding of the way in which these are conceptualized within existing literature.This information is often acquired in an ad hoc fashion, however a useful and increasingly popular way to collect and organize important background information and develop a picture of the existing evidence base is to conduct a scoping review.Such reviews may be published as a research outcome in their own right and are appealing since they produce a broad map of the evidence that, if sufficiently transparent and widely available via publication, can be used by many and for applications beyond the authors originally intended purpose.Scoping reviews can inform a systematic review, particularly one with a very broad topic scope, such as those edited by the Cochrane Public Health Group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Armstrong et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4ae67808b00a4799c3a7https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework2005 · 37,264 citations
  2. 2Scoping studies: advancing the methodology2010 · 15,462 citations
  3. 3Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards2010 · 294 citations
  4. 4A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies2009 · 10,655 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts1992 · 1,483 citations