March 28, 2013Veterinary and Comparative Oncology

Response evaluation criteria for solid tumours in dogs (v1.0): a Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) consensus document

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SNSandra NguyenCalifornia State University, Fullerton DTDouglas H. ThammUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center DVDavid M. VailUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Consensus guideline reports standardized response evaluation criteria in dogs with solid tumours, indicating improved comparability across veterinary clinical trials.

Key Points

Standardized response evaluation criteria define reproducible tumor assessment procedures for canine solid tumours, establishing cRECIST to benchmark clinical outcomes.
Guideline framework adapted human RECIST criteria through consensus from veterinary oncology specialists, standardizing tumor measurement rules for clinical trials.
Supports cross-study comparability across diverse veterinary oncology protocols, enabling consistent therapeutic efficacy evaluations in companion animals with cancer.

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd598c80eea7d3f699baf8 https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.12032

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Consensus guideline reports standardized response evaluation criteria in dogs with solid tumours, indicating improved comparability across veterinary clinical trials.

Response evaluation criteria for solid tumours in dogs (v1.0): a Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) consensus document

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Response evaluation criteria for solid tumours in dogs (v1.0): a Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) consensus document

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider