Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 1983American Journal of Epidemiology

Perceived Health and Mortality: A Nine-Year Follow-Up of the Human Population Laboratory Cohort1

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does a poor perceived health rating predict increased mortality in adults?

Population

6,928 adults from a random sample in Alameda County, California (1965 Human Population Laboratory survey)

Comparison

Perceived health rating of 'poor' vs Perceived health rating of 'excellent'

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

9 years

Authors

GKGeorge A. KaplanCross-Cutting CardiologyTCTerry CamachoCalifornia Health and Human Services Agency

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports inclusion of self-rated health in prognostic research; should not yet change clinical practice.

Structured PICO

Does a poor perceived health rating predict increased mortality in adults?

P
Population
6,928 adults from a random sample in Alameda County, California (1965 Human Population Laboratory survey)
I
Intervention
Perceived health rating of 'poor'
C
Comparator
Perceived health rating of 'excellent'
O
Outcome
Mortality from all causes over a nine-year follow-uphard clinical

Poor perceived health is a strong, independent predictor of all-cause mortality over a 9-year period, even after adjusting for physical health status and other psychosocial factors.

Cite This Study

Kaplan et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd61cb0644c7b49d40d4e2https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113541
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share