Why the study?
Objective pain assessment research is limited by subjective self-reporting scales, and pain studies face the difficulty of potential harm caused to participants.
Does thermal grill stimulation safely induce pain that can be validated by electrodermal activity in healthy volunteers?
Does thermal grill stimulation safely induce pain that can be validated by electrodermal activity in healthy volunteers?
Thermal grill stimulation is a safe and effective method to induce multilevel pain in healthy volunteers, which can be objectively validated using electrodermal activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support thermal grill use for graded experimental pain in volunteers; leaves open clinical translation and patient validation.
We have tested the feasibility of thermal grills, a harmless method to induce pain. The thermal grills consist of interlaced tubes that are set at cool or warm temperatures, creating a painful "illusion" (no tissue injury is caused) in the brain when the cool and warm stimuli are presented collectively. Advancement in objective pain assessment research is limited because the gold standard, the self-reporting pain scale, is highly subjective and only works for alert and cooperative patients. However, the main difficulty for pain studies is the potential harm caused to participants. We have recruited 23 subjects in whom we induced electric pulses and thermal grill (TG) stimulation. The TG effectively induced three different levels of pain, as evidenced by the visual analog scale (VAS) provided by the subjects after each stimulus. Furthermore, objective physiological measurements based on electrodermal activity showed a significant increase in levels as stimulation level increased. We found that VAS was highly correlated with the TG stimulation level. The TG stimulation safely elicited pain levels up to 9 out of 10. The TG stimulation allows for extending studies of pain to ranges of pain in which other stimuli are harmful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posada–Quintero et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: