PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Pre-Experiential Constraint Reconstruction: A Structural Account of the Prior Layer in Dialogue with Jung

View Full Paper
GPGriselda PoeLehman College

Key Points

  • The aim is to provide a structural explanation for pre-experiential memory without relying on content retrieval. It seeks to redefine how past experiences influence current cognition.
  • Expanded the three-layer cognitive architecture model
  • Introduced the concept of a Prior layer as a structural constraint
  • Explored the CF/EF distinction in processing configurations
  • Examined interactions with Jung's theory of archetypes
  • Proposes that pre-experiential memories are generated through constraint-based reconstruction rather than retrieval
  • Demonstrates that the manifestation of familiarity varies based on core or modulation foregrounding
  • Suggests that archetypal experiences can be understood as Prior layer constraints rather than intrinsic content

Abstract

Experiences commonly described as pre-experiential memory—such as immediate recognition, familiarity without prior exposure, and the sense of "already knowing"—are typically interpreted as the retrieval of stored content. However, this storage-based account does not provide a structurally consistent explanation of how such content is preserved prior to experience or reactivated in a form that aligns with present input. This paper extends the three-layer cognitive architecture developed in prior work in this series (Poe, 2026n), in which cognition operates across Core processing, Modulation, and an operationally inaccessible Prior layer that supplies constraints to all processing. This paper proposes an alternative account in which these phenomena are understood as the outcome of constraint-based reconstruction rather than content retrieval. In this framework, cognition operates not by accessing stored representations, but by generating content through alignment between incoming input and a pre-existing constraint structure defined here as the Prior layer. The Prior layer is operationally prior to conscious processing, inaccessible to direct inspection, and persistent across instances of experience. Its existence is not assumed but inferred as a structural necessity implied by the operation of reconstruction itself. The present account further specifies that reconstruction does not occur uniformly across all processing configurations. Whether Prior layer constraint reaches reconstruction intact depends on whether processing is Core-foregrounded or Modulation-foregrounded. This distinction—formalized here as the CF/EF distinction—accounts for the divergence between individuals who report pre-experiential familiarity or the sense of "already knowing" and those who do not. The account is situated in dialogue with Jung's theory of archetypes. What Jung identified as archetypal patterns can be reinterpreted not as inherited content but as Prior layer constraint. The CF/EF distinction further specifies why archetypal experience is not universal—a divergence Jung observed but did not structurally account for. This framework is descriptive in scope. It specifies the processing conditions under which pre-experiential phenomena arise, without addressing the origin of the Prior layer or the metaphysical status of the experiences described.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Griselda Poe (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddda22e195c95cdefd7964https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19543483
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper