Intra and interobserver variability for plaque volume measurements by DSCT were 6+/-5% and 11+/-7%, respectively. Mean total plaque volume by DSCT was 89+/-66 mm(3) (range 14-400 mm(3)). Mean total plaque volume by IVUS was 90+/-73 mm(3) (range 16-409 mm(3)). The mean difference between DSCT and IVUS was 1+/-34 mm(3) (range -131-85 mm(3)). Despite the good correlation for plaque volume measurements (r=0.89, p<0.001), agreement between the two methods was only modest (Bland-Altman limits of agreement -67 to +65 mm(3)). CONCLUSIONS ; Non-calcified plaque volumes as determined by DSCT yielded good correlation but only modest agreement in comparison with IVUS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schepis et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: