⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

March 31, 2015The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Evaluation of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis by Fecal Calprotectin Vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Both FIT and Fcal can efficiently predict MH in UC, but FIT appears to be more sensitive than Fcal for predicting MES 0 alone.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Takashima et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de7e774838c5c0bab0bee0 https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.66

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A New Rapid Quantitative Test for Fecal Calprotectin Predicts Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative ColitisCohort Study · 2013 · 118 citations
2Evaluation of Mucosal Healing of Ulcerative Colitis by a Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical TestDiagnostic Study · 2012 · 107 citations
3Performance Characteristics and Evaluation of an Automated-Developed and Quantitative, Immunochemical, Fecal Occult Blood Screening TestDiagnostic Study · 2005 · 150 citations
4The value of fecal calprotectin as a marker of intestinal inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitisOriginal Research · 2012 · 30 citations
5Fecal Calprotectin More Accurately Reflects Endoscopic Activity of Ulcerative Colitis than the Lichtiger Index, C-reactive Protein, Platelets, Hemoglobin, and Blood LeukocytesCohort Study · 2013 · 299 citations