Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We derive a stock ranking by applying a technical features-based random forest model on an international dataset of liquid stocks. Rather than predicted return, our ranking is based on outperformance probability. By applying a decile split, we find that long–short portfolios achieve Sharpe ratios of up to 1.95 and a highly significant yearly six-factor alpha of up to 21.79%. Moreover, we show that outperformance probabilities serve as a superior measure of future returns in the context of portfolio optimization. Mean–variance portfolios using this measure are less volatile and more profitable than equally- or value-weighted portfolios. Our findings are robust to firm size, regional restrictions, and non-crisis periods and cannot be explained by limits to arbitrage. • Technical indicators predict outperformance in the cross-section. • Investors may identify outperforming stocks using machine learning models. • Outperformance probability is a superior measure of future stock return. • Identified return patterns remain valid for large stocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian Breitung (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: