Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2024IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language ProcessingOpen Access

Spatial Analysis and Synthesis Methods: Subjective and Objective Evaluations Using Various Microphone Arrays in the Auralization of a Critical Listening Room

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

APAlan PawlakHLHyunkook LeeAMAki Mäkivirta

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Perceptual and acoustic evaluation reveals fidelity differences across sound reproduction methods in a critical listening room, highlighting the influence of microphone arrays.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the perceptual and objective acoustic performance of parametric sound field reproduction methods across different microphone arrays and processing configurations in a critical listening room.
  • Assessed spatial reproduction frameworks, specifically the Spatial Decomposition Method (SDM) and Higher-Order Spatial Impulse Response Rendering (HO-SIRR), across varied microphone array configurations and direction of arrival (DOA) estimation approaches.
  • Conducted static-head perceptual listening tests benchmarked against reference binaural rendering alongside objective acoustic parameter measurements.
  • All evaluated spatial reproduction systems remained perceptually distinguishable from the binaural reference condition in listening tests.
  • Employing a high-quality center pressure microphone enhanced the timbral fidelity of SDM and improved spatial fidelity under specific conditions, yielding spatial performance comparable to HO-SIRR.
  • Binaural SDM presentations exhibited noticeable temporal artifacts that degraded auditory quality, with SDM performance shifting according to array construction and DOA estimation methods.

Cite This Study

Pawlak et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df0fc0de200760a86143behttps://doi.org/10.1109/taslp.2024.3449037
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share