Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has a heterogeneous aetiology and overlapping comorbidities, with differing diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic recommendations between guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes current guidelines and evidence for HFpEF, highlighting the strong evidence base for SGLT2 inhibitors and advising against routine beta-blocker use.
The aetiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is heterogenous and overlaps with that of several comorbidities like atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, iron deficiency, or sarcopenia. The diagnosis of HFpEF involves evaluating cardiac dysfunction through imaging techniques and assessing increased left ventricular filling pressure, which can be measured directly or estimated through various proxies including natriuretic peptides. To better narrow down the differential diagnosis of HFpEF, European and American heart failure guidelines advocate the use of different algorithms including comorbidities that require diagnosis and rigorous treatment during the evaluation process. Therapeutic recommendations differ between guidelines. Whilst sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors have a solid evidence base, the recommendations differ with regard to the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Unless indicated for specific comorbidities, the use of beta-blockers should be discouraged in HFpEF. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in HFpEF diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haehling et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: