This analysis reveals survival rates post-pars plana vitrectomy in diabetes-related eye issues, suggesting ongoing needs for patient care.
Purpose: To provide updated survival data for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and identify associated prognostic factors. Methods: An aggregated electronic health records research network was used to identify patients with a diagnosis of PDR who underwent PPV between 2009 and 2019 and a control group of patients with PDR without a history of PPV. Groups were propensity score matched for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and HbA1c. Main outcomes included survival rates at 3, 5, and 10 years using the Kaplan-Meier life table method. Additional analyses were performed to assess if survival rates differed in patients with PDR by PPV indication (vitreous hemorrhage [VH] or tractional retinal detachment [TRD]). Results: A total of 8637 patients were included. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates in patients with PDR after PPV were 89.2%, 80.9%, and 52.8%, respectively. Survival rates in patients with PDR with a history of PPV vs without a history of PPV were lower at 3 (88.7% vs 89.9%; P = .03), 5 (80.2% vs 82.6%; P < .01), and 10 years (51.4% vs 55.8%; P < .01). Survival rates were similar between patients who underwent PPV for VH or TRD at 3 (90.4% vs 88.7%; P = .05), 5 (82.7% vs 81.0%; P = .10), and 10 years (53.0% vs 53.4%; P = .75). Conclusions: Despite major advances in diabetes care, the long-term survival rates in patients with PDR after PPV have remained stable the last 2 decades, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary evaluation and prompt cardiovascular and renal optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: