Compares IOL tilt and decentration outcomes between two fixation techniques, suggesting both methods yield stable results.
Background: To compare tilt and decentration results of two scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) methods of four-point scleral fixation (Akreos AO60) and the Yamane technique (AcrySof MA60AC). Methods: Two groups were compared in terms of IOL decentration and tilt at day 30 and 2 years after surgery. Correlations between IOL tilt and decentration and previous pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), axial length (AL), refractive error (RE), astigmatism, and spherical equivalent (SE) were also analyzed. Results: This study included 50 eyes from 47 patients: four-point fixation in 25 eyes (group 1) and Yamane technique in 25 eyes (group 2). The mean horizontal tilt was 1.66° ± 1.45° in group 1 and 5.06° ± 4.65° in group 2. The horizontal tilt value was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in group 2. The mean vertical tilt for group 1 and group 2 at two year’s observation was 1.74° ± 2.16° and 3.09° ± 2.79° respectively (p = 0.02). The mean horizontal IOL decentration was 0.35 ± 0.32 mm in group 1 and 0.34 ± 0.26 mm in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mean vertical IOL decentration in group 1 was 0.34 ± 0.33 mm and in group 2 it was 0.27 ± 0.20 mm respectively (p = 0.45). No statistically significant changes in tilt and decentration time were demonstrated in both groups (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between IOL tilt and decentration and previous PPV in both groups. Conclusions: Both techniques provide good centration and stability IOL in aphakic eyes in the absence of capsular support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blagun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: