Journal club reviews evidence on blood eosinophil count guiding therapy in acute exacerbations of COPD and asthma, suggesting implications for treatment decisions.
This Journal club evaluates recent evidence on the role of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker to guide therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD and asthma. The review focuses on three studies with different methodological approaches: a biomarker-directed corticosteroid trial (B afadhel et al ., 2012), an acute biologic therapy trial using benralizumab (ABRA, 2025) and a long-term biologic therapy trial using mepolizumab (COPD-HELP, 2025). The biomarker-directed corticosteroid study demonstrated non-inferior symptom improvement while reducing steroid exposure, highlighting the potential to personalise therapy based on BEC. The ABRA trial showed that a single injection of benralizumab reduced treatment failure, prolonged time to exacerbation and improved symptom scores in patients with high eosinophils. By contrast, the COPD-HELP trial found no significant effect of mepolizumab on readmission or mortality, despite substantial eosinophil reduction. Limitations include small sample sizes, heterogeneous populations and reliance on surrogate end-points in some studies. These findings support the use of BEC-guided therapy in acute settings but suggest that long-term biologic treatment post-exacerbation may not improve hard outcomes. Future research should focus on precision medicine strategies targeting eosinophilic exacerbations and identifying patient subgroups who benefit most from biomarker-guided interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godallage et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: