Randomized trial evaluates blood eosinophil measurements for COPD diagnosis, suggesting improved assessment methods.
Objective Biologic therapies for eosinophilic COPD require a blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥300 cells/µL for eligibility. Landmark trials used a single screening measurement, yet BEC exhibits substantial within-patient variability. The study aimed to evaluate the optimal number of measurements to reliably detect the eosinophilic phenotype in COPD. Methods We developed a decision-analytic simulation model using pooled estimates of BEC variability from independent COPD cohorts, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) pooled using Fisher's z transformation. Persistence data from five cohorts - ECLIPSE, COSYCONET, CHAIN, BODE, and a Swedish cohort - comprising a total of 3347 patients, were used to estimate the probability of detecting BEC ≥300 cells/µL at least once according to the number of serial measurements. Results Using the ≥300 cells/µL threshold, the pooled COPD population was classified as persistent eosinophilia, 9.2%; intermittent eosinophilia, 32.5%; and never eosinophilic, 58.3%. Among patients with intermittent eosinophilia, one measurement detected BEC ≥300 cells/µL in 43% of cases. Two measurements at 6-month intervals increased detection to 67%, three measurements over 12 months to 81%, and five measurements over 24 months to 94%. Weighted pooled ICCs declined from 0.784 at ≤3 months to 0.570 at ≥36 months, supporting greater variability over longer intervals. Conclusions Intermittent eosinophilia affects approximately one-third of patients with COPD and may be missed by single-BEC screening. In this model, three measurements over 12 months achieved ≥80% detection. Integrating historical and prospective BEC values may improve biologic eligibility assessment without delaying treatment decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: