Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals imaging modality discrepancies affect surgical decisions for pancreatic cysts, indicating need for multimodal assessment.
IntroductionAccurate preoperative measurement of pancreatic cystic lesions is critical for surgical decision-making, particularly around the 3 cm threshold frequently cited in resection guidelines. However, imaging modalities may provide discrepant size estimates, potentially altering management.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients from a single endoscopist practice (November 2011-November 2024) who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic cystic lesions with available MRI and/or CT imaging results. For each modality, the largest recorded dimension was extracted. One-way ANOVA was performed to assess mean size differences, and concordance across the 3 cm surgical threshold was calculated with Cohen's κ.ResultsA total of 190 patients with 246 patient encounters were included. Mean cyst size was 2.93 ± 1.32 cm on MRI (n = 147), 2.95 ± 1.53 cm on EUS (n = 246), and 3.20 ± 1.73 cm on CT (n = 159). The differences were not statistically significant (P = .194). Across modalities, the mean absolute difference in size ranged from 0.7 to 0.9 cm, with outliers exceeding 2 cm. Concordance at the 3 cm cutoff was common; there was good agreement between EUS and MRI (κ = 0.643; P < .001) and moderate agreement between EUS and CT (κ = 0.472; P < .001).ConclusionSubstantial variability exists in preoperative size assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions, with 7.5-20% of cysts misclassified around the 3 cm cutoff. Given that cyst size is a key determinant of surgical intervention, reliance on a single modality may introduce bias into clinical decision-making. Multimodality assessment reduces discordance and may improve risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bresler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: