PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE0 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Aspect Ratio on the Performance of Geocell-Reinforced Footings in Sandy Soils

AGAyhan GürbüzKYKaan YünkülSDSarper Demirdöğen

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how footing aspect ratio and soil density affect the performance of both unreinforced and geocell-reinforced footings.
  • Conducted 36 three-dimensional finite element analyses
  • Validated findings against physical model tests
  • Examined footings with aspect ratios from 1 to 10 on loose and dense sands
  • Geocell reinforcement significantly increases bearing pressures and ultimate bearing capacities
  • Improvement factors ranged from 1.12 to 2.56, with maximum improvements in square footings
  • Maximum shape factor for unreinforced footings occurred at an aspect ratio of 2, shifting to 1 for geocell-reinforced conditions

Abstract

The aspect ratio of the shallow footing is a key parameter affecting the bearing capacity performances. However, the recommendations of previous studies exhibit notable inconsistencies among themselves for the unreinforced condition, and no numerical study in the literature has investigated the effect of aspect ratio under geocell-reinforced condition. This pioneer study investigates the influence of footing aspect ratio and soil relative density on the ultimate bearing capacity, shape factor, improvement factor, and failure mechanism of unreinforced and geocell-reinforced footings resting on sandy soils. A total of 36 rigorous three-dimensional finite element analyses were performed and validated against physical model tests. The analyses considered footings with aspect ratios ranging from 1 to 10 placed on loose and dense sands. The results showed that geocell reinforcement substantially improves footing performance by increasing bearing pressures, ultimate bearing capacities, stiffness of the footing pressure versus footing settlement ratio curves and shape factor values. Improvement factors were observed to lie between 1.12 and 2.56, with square footings showing the maximum improvement, and the magnitude of improvement increasing as the relative density increased. Furthermore, for unreinforced footings, the maximum shape factor occurred at aspect ratio of 2, whereas in geocell-reinforced conditions, the peak shifted to aspect ratio of 1. The shape factor values also increased with increasing relative density. Moreover, it was observed that the aspect ratio influences both the failure surface geometry and reinforcement mechanism of geocell.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gürbüz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfe05cdc762e9d858e43https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1843545
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bearing capacity and settlement behavior of square footing on coir geocell–reinforced sand under concentric and eccentric loading2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Experimental and numerical investigation on the behavior of strip footing on geocell reinforced sand2024
  3. 3Influence of key parameters on geocell performance: a review of laboratory investigations2026
  4. 4Settlement and Mobilized Bearing Capacity of Circular Footings on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Sand: Experimental and Numerical Study2026 · 4 citations
  5. 5Mesoscale Mechanism Study of Geocell-Reinforced Foundation Under Strip Footing Using PFC3D2026 · 1 citations