In today's India, competitive exams are the way to jobs, social status and progression. Every year, lakhs of youth prepare for the UPSC,SSC, NET, NEET and banking, railway and different state-level government services exams. These exams are presented as merit- based, fair and give equal opportunities to all. However, the real lived experiences of aspirants often show stress, doubt, repeated failure and psychological pressure. This paper, based on Emile Durkheim's concept of anomie and Robert K. Merton's theory of strain, gives a theoretical sociological perspective on these exam preparation process. Based on their everyday experiences – such as long preparation time, financial dependency, family expectations and social comparison – this paper argues that the culture of competitive exams creates anomie and strain. The gap between socially approved goals and limited institutional paths creates anxiety, confusion, and frustration in aspirants.This analysis may be useful for government (for policy making), coaching classes, aspirants and their families. The paper concludes that the understanding competitive exams through sociological lens, helps to shift the focus from individual failures to the structural conditions and emphasizes the need for a more humanistic approach to youth expectations and job opportunities.
Singh et al. (Thu,) studied this question.