This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We identified a positive association between intronic burden and CI. One of the possible explanations of this is the idea of a cost-benefits balance. Evolutionarily conserved (functionally important) genes can "afford" the negative consequences of maintaining multiple introns because these consequences are outweighed by the benefit of maintaining the gene. Evolutionarily conserved and functionally important genes may use introns to create novel splice variants to tune the gene function to developmental stage and tissue type.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorlova et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: