Key result
Intron-containing human genes show distinct 5-6mer oligonucleotide distributions versus intron-lacking genes.
p-value: p=0.01
Bioinformatic comparison of human genes with and without introns identified putative novel human splicing regulation sequences.
Hypothesis-generating for novel splicing motifs; requires functional validation before clinical relevance.
Of the rules used by the splicing machinery to precisely determine intron-exon boundaries only a fraction is known. Recent evidence suggests that specific short sequences within exons help in defining these boundaries. Such sequences are known as exonic splicing enhancers (ESE). A possible bioinformatical approach to studying ESE sequences is to compare genes that harbor introns with genes that do not. For this purpose two non-redundant samples of 719 intron-containing and 63 intron-lacking human genes were created. We performed a statistical analysis on these datasets of intron-containing and intron-lacking human coding sequences and found a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01) between these samples in terms of 5-6mer oligonucleotide distributions. The difference is not created by a few strong signals present in the majority of exons, but rather by the accumulation of multiple weak signals through small variations in codon frequencies, codon biases and context-dependent codon biases between the samples. A list of putative novel human splicing regulation sequences has been elucidated by our analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andriy Fedorov (2001) studied this question. Intron-containing genes vs. Intron-lacking genes was evaluated on 5-6mer oligonucleotide distributions (p=0.01). Intron-containing human genes showed a statistically significant difference in 5-6mer oligonucleotide distributions compared to intron-lacking genes (P = 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: