Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Researchers demonstrate alternative interpretations of hierarchical regression findings, suggesting a broader understanding of data implications.
Researchers using a hierarchical regression paradigm enter different variables at different steps in the analysis, each time determining ΔR². Although ΔR² is traditional for both zero-order correlation coefficients and multiple correlation coefficients, it is not the only possibility. It is also possible to use binomial effect size displays and gain-probability analyses to interpret zero-order correlation coefficients. However, nobody has explored the possibility of extending these latter advances from zero-order correlation coefficients to the multiple correlation coefficients obtained in successive steps of hierarchical regression analyses. The present exposition and tutorial show that binomial effect size display and gain-probability interpretations can imply different conclusions both from each other and from ΔR². The message is not that a single interpretation should dominate but that multiple interpretations provide researchers with a more thorough and comprehensive understanding of the implications of the data. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Trafimow (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: