Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Translation and validation of MIBS-4 enhances migraine evaluation in Italian individuals, indicating reliable findings.
The Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4) is a brief validated patient-reported measure of migraine interictal impact; however, an official Italian translation is not currently available. The MIBS-4 was translated and culturally adapted into Italian language and psychometrically evaluated in adults with episodic or chronic migraine enrolled in the Italian Headache Registry (RICe). In a 4-week test–retest design, participants completed the Italian version of MIBS-4 and the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) at baseline (T0) and at follow up (T1). We assessed internal consistency, dimensionality, test–retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity across MIDAS disability grades. A total of 191 patients with migraine were included in test–retest analyses. Internal consistency was good to excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.86 at T0; 0.90 at T1; ordinal α = 0.91–0.94; McDonald’s ω = 0.88–0.91). Parallel analysis supported a stable one-factor solution at both timepoints. Item-level agreement was moderate (weighted κ = 0.45–0.60; all p < 0.001), as was the total-score stability (ICC[A,1] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.72). Convergent validity with MIDAS was moderate (ρ = 0.40 at T0; ρ = 0.33 at T1; both p < 0.001). The present findings indicate that the Italian MIBS-4 is psychometrically robust and captures a dimension of migraine burden that is only partially explained by conventional attack-focused disability measures. The Italian version of MIBS-4 provides a reliable instrument for quantifying interictal burden in Italian-speaking migraine individuals, enabling a more comprehensive evaluation of migraine and supporting individualized management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: