The increasing penetration of wind generation requires performance evaluation methods that extend beyond average annual energy production. Temporal delivery characteristics, such as monthly dispersion and exposure to low-production periods, can influence both technical robustness and economic sensitivity. Building upon a previously developed probabilistic and entropy-based assessment framework, this study evaluates the robustness of delivery-oriented performance metrics for onshore and offshore wind units under parametric and economic uncertainty. Using high-resolution operational data from four wind units (three onshore and one offshore), the analysis incorporates percentile sensitivity, threshold variation in low-production exposure, bootstrap-based uncertainty intervals, and Monte Carlo simulation of economic inputs including CAPEX, operation and maintenance costs, and discount rate. The results indicate that variations in percentile definitions and stochastic economic assumptions modify absolute performance values but do not substantially alter the relative positioning between offshore and onshore units. Averaged over 2022–2024, the analyzed offshore unit exhibited a lower monthly energy dispersion coefficient (CVE=0.255) Reviewer2than the analyzed onshore units (CVE=0.368), Reviewer2corresponding to an approximate 30% reduction in relative variability. The offshore unit also showed lower mean low-production exposure (LPE=0.526 versus 0.581 for onshore units) Reviewer2and consistently lower amplification of robustness-adjusted LCOE under conservative delivery assumptions. These results indicate that the analyzed offshore unit retains stronger delivery robustness and lower economic sensitivity across the tested parameter ranges. The proposed robustness-validation framework complements conventional yield-based assessments and provides additional insight for risk-aware evaluation of wind generation assets in renewable-dominated power systems.
Camilo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: