PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Transplantation0 citations

DNAemia Thresholds to Discontinue Antivirals in Preemptive Management for Cytomegalovirus Seropositive Recipients After Kidney Transplantation

View Full Paper
AMArthur Heinz MiehrigUniversidade Federal de São PauloRFRenato Demarchi ForestoHospital do Rim e HipertensãoHTHelio Tedesco-SilvaHospital do Rim e Hipertensão

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the safety and efficacy of lower DNAemia thresholds for discontinuing antiviral therapy in CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients.
  • Retrospective cohort study involving 1048 CMV IgG-positive kidney transplant recipients.
  • Two periods compared: undetectable DNAemia (<log 10 1.49) and low DNAemia (<log 10 2.30).
  • Followed participants for one year to assess outcomes related to CMV recurrence.
  • 49.1% of patients met the DNAemia threshold for antiviral treatment.
  • CMV recurrence was similar in both groups (12.2% vs 10.8%).
  • Lower DNAemia threshold group required less time to reach the treatment withdrawal threshold (23 vs 27 days, P < 0.001).
  • Recurrence occurred earlier in the low DNAemia period (average 37 days vs 44 days, P = 0.08).

Abstract

Background. Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) after kidney transplantation aims to achieve cessation of viral replication; however, the use of highly sensitive DNA assays creates uncertainty regarding the optimal DNAemia threshold for safely discontinuing antiviral therapy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ending antiviral therapy at a lower DNAemia cutoff (<log 10 2.30; 200 IU/mL), compared with undetectable DNAemia (<log 10 1.49; 31 IU/mL). Methods. This retrospective cohort study included 1048 CMV IgG-positive kidney transplant recipients under a preemptive strategy for CMV prevention: 664 in the undetectable DNAemia period (March 2018–July 2019) and 384 in the low DNAemia period (August 2019–July 2020), with 1-y follow-up. The primary outcome was CMV recurrence. Secondary outcomes included antiviral duration, refractory CMV, and time to recurrence. Results. A total of 515 patients (49.1%) met the DNAemia threshold for antiviral treatment, of whom 195 (18.6%) presented with CMV-related symptoms. The low DNAemia period required less time to achieve the DNAemia threshold for treatment withdrawal (23 versus 27 d; P < 0.001). CMV recurrence was similar (12.2% versus 10.8%), as were rates of recurrent CMV disease, refractory CMV, acute rejection, and graft function. Recurrence tended to occur earlier in the low DNAemia period (37 versus 44 d; P = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, only older donor age (hazard ratio, 1.024; P = 0.004) and earlier CMV onset (hazard ratio, 0.968; P < 0.001) were associated with recurrence. Conclusions. Setting the DNAemia threshold at <200 IU/mL to end antiviral therapy was safe, shortened treatment, and did not increase CMV recurrence. These real-life results support a new threshold for stopping treatment in CMV-IgG-positive patients under a preemptive strategy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miehrig et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e471ef010ef96374d8e24chttps://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000005695
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper