Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review analyzes media effects on pseudoscience usage, highlighting critical health impacts among the population.
Pseudoscience is not a fringe issue in society; it influences decisions on health or finances. Although there is not robust data on pseudoscience usage, most national studies estimate that it is used by 10% of the population. It is also not a fringe issue in research. This systematic literature review aims to analyse the existing body of research on this topic, with a primary focus on media and communication . The review is restricted to three databases (Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and B-on), and data collection ended in 2022. From the analysis of 12,531 articles, it is shown that interest in pseudoscience exploded this century, mainly in health (75% of the sample), and that health and economic costs are a main issue regarding these practices. In media and communication (172 articles), the interest has been limited. Media effects are unexplored, highlighting a need to better understand how pseudoscience is communicated and used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramalho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: