Develops a knowledge graph system to enhance urban soil management, indicating improved answer retrieval for contaminated sites.
Urban soil contamination poses persistent risks to redevelopment, public health, and ecological restoration, yet actionable evidence is scattered across site investigation reports, monitoring databases, and regulatory documents. Existing decision-support tools often depend on manual searches and provide limited structured reasoning. This study develops a domain knowledge graph (KG) and a KG-powered question-answering (KBQA) system for urban soil management to organize multi-source evidence and deliver precise, auditable answers to parcel- and pollutant-specific queries. The approach (1) defines an urban soil ontology covering parcels, land uses, pollutants, measurements, pathways, and regulatory thresholds; (2) extracts and links entities and relations from textual and tabular sources; (3) constructs a graph database with provenance; and (4) implements a KBQA pipeline that maps natural-language questions to constrained graph queries and verbalizes results with citations. The resulting system supports source identification, land-use-specific exceedance checks, affected-parcel listing, and remediation reference retrieval. Experiments on a curated QA set and a South China case study show higher answer accuracy and lower latency than text-only baselines, while consistently returning traceable evidence and reducing cross-document lookup effort. Compared to text-only RAG baselines, the KG-powered system achieved a 0.14 improvement in Exact Match scores (e.g., 0.81 vs. 0.58 for Threshold tasks) and maintained a competitive median latency of 0.75 s. The pipeline utilizes a 13B-parameter instruction-tuned LLM. The ontology, schema, benchmark QA sets, and sample queries are publicly released to support transfer to other regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: