Observational techniques enhance orbit accuracy for near-Earth asteroids, indicating improved exploration potential.
Precise orbit determination of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) provides a critical foundation for exploration missions. Considering that cislunar space is a critical domain for future human space activities and the unique positional advantage of the Earth-Moon L1 point, space-based optical observations from the Earth-Moon L1 point’s orbit hold significant potential for improving NEAs orbit determination accuracy. Coordinating such space-based observations with ground-based optical observations is expected to provide essential technical support for high-precision orbit determination. This study focused on two representative NEAs, 2016HO3 and Apophis. We validated the effectiveness of existing optical observations by processing 328 latest ground-based data of 2016HO3. The calculated position true error of the initial state vector was 31.932 km, with a position uncertainty of 24.293 km. The Yarkovsky effect parameter A2 of 2016HO3 was solved to be (−1.257 ± 0.343)×10−13 AU/day2. Furthermore, we conducted ground-space based orbit determination simulation analyses for 2016HO3 and Apophis to quantitatively evaluate the potential advantages of combining optical observations from the Earth-Moon L1 point’s orbit with ground-based observations in enhancing orbit determination accuracy. The results indicate that within the observation accuracy considered in this study, space-based optical observations reduce orbit determination uncertainty by up to 20% for 2016HO3 and 62% for Apophis. The inclusion of space-based observations reduces the position true error by up to 50% for 2016HO3 and 83% for Apophis, and it can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of A2. Additionally, we found that the orbit error of the L1 point probe has a notable influence on the position true error of NEAs, reaching several kilometers for 2016HO3 and several hundred meters for Apophis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: