Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals CMS turnover metrics underestimate turnover in nursing homes, indicating potential misrepresentation of workforce stability.
Introduction Federal policy mandates adequate nursing home (NH) staffing, yet staffing adequacy remains difficult to define and measure. In 2022, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) incorporated annual turnover into Five-Star Ratings but adopted a definition excluding staff below a 120-hour-in-90-days threshold, potentially underestimating turnover and weakening validity. Methods Using Payroll-Based Journal and CareCompare data (2020Q2–2024Q1), we replicated CMS-reported turnover and constructed an inclusive measure counting new hires. We assessed divergence between definitions, associations with ten standardized CMS quality indicators, and changes in facility rankings. Results By 2022–2023, 45% of nursing hires were excluded under CMS’s definition. As short-term staffing increased, CMS-specification and inclusive turnover diverged (correlation 0.91 to 0.82). Associations with quality outcomes were modest and similar across definitions. However, facility rankings differed substantially: only 30% of facilities remained in the same turnover decile, with reclassification concentrated among NHs with high short-term attrition, greater contract use, and distinct ownership and payer mix. Conclusion CMS turnover metrics miss nearly half of turnover, understating instability and reshaping facility comparisons without improving associations with quality outcomes. As short-term staffing expands, the CMS measure risks becoming less informative about workforce instability, underscoring how metric definitions shape oversight and reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petterson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: