Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QTRLS demonstrates high fidelity in reversible quantum optimization, indicating significant thermodynamic energy recovery potential.
Hardware Validation (18 April 2026) Following simulator validation across 150 trials (4, 8, and 16 qubit scales), QTRLS v3 was validated on real quantum hardware via IonQ Forte QPU (ionq.qpu.forte-1) accessed through Azure Quantum. A 4-qubit F_R measurement was performed using the native IonQ JSON circuit format, submitting forward and reversed QTRLS circuits (theta = [0.5, 1.2, 0.8, 1.7], theta_opt = [1.1, 0.9, 1.4, 0.6], 1000 shots each). F_R was computed as the Bhattacharyya coefficient between the forward and reversed measurement distributions — a hardware-compatible proxy for the statevector fidelity used in simulation. Hardware result: F_R = 0.9945 This compares to the 4-qubit simulator baseline mean of F_R = 0.9508 across 50 trials. The high hardware F_R reflects IonQ Forte's gate fidelity at this circuit depth (32 gates forward, 60 gates reversed), confirming that the F_R coupling signal is measurable on physical quantum hardware. Verifiable job provenance: Forward job ID: 5c4dc0da-3ac9-11f1-a37c-96a58bb47abc Reversed job ID: 5d6bb990-3ac9-11f1-a37c-96a58bb47abc Target: ionq.qpu.forte-1 Workspace: sharaf-hw4 (Azure Quantum, East US) Date: 18 April 2026 Raw results are included in qtrls_hardware_result.json. Version 6 — 18 April 2026: 16-qubit scaling validation complete.50/50 convergence. Mean final F_R 0.7924. Full scalinglaw confirmed across 4, 8, and 16 qubits. 150/150 totaltrials converged. Code on request. Patent GB2608473.1. Version 5 — 17 April 2026: 8-qubit scaling validation.50/50 convergence with smart initialization.Mean convergence iteration 30.8. Mean final F_R 0.9179.Full comparison: 4-qubit (50/50, iter 123.8, F_R 0.9508)vs 8-qubit smart init (50/50, iter 30.8, F_R 0.9179).Code available on request. Patent pending GB2608473.1. Version 4 UPDATE — 17 April 2026: 50-trial independent validation.100% convergence rate. Mean final F_R 0.9508.Code available on request. Patent pending GB2608473.1. Version 3.1 UPDATE — 17 April 2026: Implementation details removed from correction notice for confidentiality. Full technical details in forthcoming paper. Results unchanged from v3. Version 3 UPDATE — 17 April 2026: Critical implementation error in v2 corrected. Real quantum gradients implemented. See qtrls_zenodo_v3.md for full correction notice. Code available upon request. Version 2 (17 April 2026): First simulation validation results added. 50 independent runs demonstrate 100% pass rate above F_R > 0.85 (mean F_R = 0.942). 60-iteration convergence demonstration achieves 80.7% loss reduction converging at iteration 54. First experimental observation of the convergence-fidelity trade-off reported. Simulation code (qtrls_4qubit.py, qtrls_convergence.py) included as supplementary files.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharaf Samiur Rahman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: