Mixed-methods study shows improved health literacy in urban marginalised populations via tailored primary care, suggesting the need for integrated community support.
Urban marginalised populations face intersecting barriers, such as poverty, unstable housing and discrimination, that erode health literacy in primary-care contexts. We examined whether an inter-professional, low-barrier primary care model improves health literacy competencies compared with usual care. A convergent mixed-methods study took place at Centretown Community Health Centre (CCHC), Ottawa (2019–2023). Phase 1 compared Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) scores between clients receiving tailored care (n = 37) and matched community members using usual services (n = 36). Phase 2 explored experiences through four focus groups and semi-structured interviews (n = 23). Independent samples t-tests and inductive thematic analysis were used. Overall health literacy was moderate in both groups; however, the tailored-care group scored higher on appraisal of health information (M = 3.03 ± 0.57 vs. 2.76 ± 0.46, p = 0.025, d = 0.53). Qualitatively, tailored-care participants described clearer chronic-disease self-management, strategic navigation of appointments, and fewer inappropriate emergency department visits. Persistently low social support scores highlighted systemic isolation. Embedding social supports, outreach, and client-centred education within primary care can strengthen critical appraisal skills in marginalised settings. Scaling such models should pair literacy interventions with broader community-support strategies. Not applicable (observational study).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McLellan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: