Observational trial evaluates cervicovaginal conditions in women living with HIV-1, indicating ongoing inflammation and HPV risks.
Background The cervicovaginal microbiome may affect HIV-1 susceptibility and can in turn influence the prevalence and clinical course of HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted diseases. As the determinants, immunological correlates and clinical effects of the dysbiosis observed in women living with HIV-1 (WWH) remain elusive, we evaluated the vaginal immunologic milieu, cervicovaginal microbiome and prevalence of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in antiretroviral-naïve WWH over their first year of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods 83 ART-naïve Ugandan WWH were enrolled in a longitudinal observational trial. Clinical evaluation and sampling of cervicovaginal secretions and plasma were performed at 0, 8, 24 and 52 weeks post-ART initiation. Amplification of the 16S-rRNA gene V3–V4 region was used to determine the cervicovaginal microbiome. A multiplex bead-array assay was used to quantify the concentration of biomarkers while a PCR-based hybridization assay was utilized for HPV detection and genotyping. Results Gardnerella was the most abundant genus with a median relative abundance of 35% before ART maintaining a high prevalence throughout the study. Vaginal bacterial diversity did not change after ART, although the relative abundance of some genera, including the bacterial-vaginosis-associated bacteria Peptostreptococcus and Prevotella, decreased compared to baseline. Inflammatory biomarkers remained elevated in the cervicovaginal compartment despite prompt decreases in plasma.The prevalence of high and low-risk HPV types remained stable despite ART. Conclusions Suppression of HIV-1 replication is not sufficient to revert dysbiotic changes, proinflammatory immunological milieu and persistent HPV infections. Exploration of targeted strategies to restore cervicovaginal mucosal immunological functions in WWH is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lisco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: