Key result
Positive CAD trials achieve higher publication rates than negative trials, highlighting publication bias.
Population
Coronary artery disease clinical trials
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Publication bias is present in coronary artery disease clinical trials, with positive outcomes published at a higher rate than negative results, which may skew evidence-based decision making.
Publication bias is present in coronary artery disease clinical trials, with positive outcomes published at a higher rate than negative results, which may skew evidence-based decision making.
Shukla et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary Artery Disease. Clinical trials with positive outcomes vs. Clinical trials with negative outcomes was evaluated on Publication rate. Clinical trials with positive outcomes in coronary artery disease had a higher publication rate compared with negative results, indicating a publication bias that may skew evidence-based medicine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: