Does multipoint pacing improve functional outcomes, echocardiographic outcomes, and reduce heart failure hospitalization compared to conventional CRT in patients with heart failure?
Patients with heart failure
Multipoint Pacing (MPP)
Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
Functional outcomes, echocardiographic outcomes, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality
Multipoint pacing may improve functional outcomes and reduce heart failure hospitalizations compared to conventional CRT, though it does not currently demonstrate a mortality benefit.
Compared with conventional CRT, MPP was associated with improved functional and echocardiographic outcomes and reduced HF hospitalization, without a demonstrated mortality benefit. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are required to assess long-term prognostic effects.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fahad Muhammad
Queen Mary University of London
Mohammad AlMeer
University of Lancashire
Eyad Jamileh
Queen's University Belfast
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
University of Sheffield
Queen Mary University of London
University of Leicester
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Muhammad et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713decb99343efc98d3d0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70259