Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of adherence on preterm delivery outcomes in pregnant women, suggesting no significant modification effects.
Objective To evaluate if the effect of low‐dose aspirin (LDA) commenced between 6 and 13 weeks of gestational age (GA) on preterm delivery (PTD) is modified by total exposure. Design Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Setting Hospitals in low‐resource settings in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Population Outcomes were obtained for 11 908/11943 women at 6 0/7 to 13 6/7 weeks' GA randomized. Methods Women received prepackaged two‐week medication allotments. Adherence was assessed by pill counts every 2 weeks. Estimated relative risk and 95% confidence interval data for each outcome at each GA of treatment initiation weeks were obtained by fitting a Poisson model to each outcome, adjusting for site, treatment arm and GA at treatment initiation. Main Outcomes Measures The primary outcome was PTD. Secondary outcomes included PTD < 34 weeks and perinatal mortality including analysis by region. Results The median gestational age at treatment initiation was 10.1 weeks (IQR 8.6, 12.0). 85.5% of the mothers had over 90% adherence to treatment. For each 1 week increase of GA at treatment initiation, the treatment risk ratio did not change for PTD [RR 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93, 1.02)], PTD < 34 weeks [< 0.98 (0.89, 1.07)] or perinatal mortality [1.04 (0.96, 1.12)], with no evidence of effect modification. For each 5% increase in adherence, the treatment risk ratio did not change for PTD [1.01 (0.99, 1.04)], PTD < 34 weeks [< 0.99 (0.95, 1.03)] or perinatal mortality [1.02 (0.98, 1.06)], indicating no meaningful interaction with adherence. There was no effect modification by region. Conclusions This analysis shows that the results of PTD, PTD < 34 weeks and perinatal mortality were not dependent on the timing of the initiation or adherence to treatment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02409680
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwenechanya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: