This research demonstrates enhanced living control in a heterogeneous swarm, indicating a shift from magnitude to phase limitations.
We present PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm v41–v42, documenting the systematic resolution of per-seed Living Control in a 50-agent heterogeneous swarm. Beginning from v40.2 (per-seed F5′ pass rate: 2/20, 10%), the v41 arc pursued four sequential scalar-amplitude approaches — normalization, BASE_SCALE sweep, corr feedback, and corr feedback variants — all of which failed through repeated empirical falsification. The core structural discovery: |corr(w, Var)| cannot be controlled through amplitude or scale adjustments (w_std ↔ |corr| anti-correlation r = −0.781). v42 introduced Phase Lead (Var_lead = Var_norm + k × clip(EMA(ΔVar, λ=0.4), ±0.25)) applied to the slow channel input, partially recovering |corr| (+0.013 at k=0.20). v42.1 added adaptive k_eff (three-stage piecewise nonlinear control policy) and W_A_COEF=3.0 (slow channel amplification), achieving 12/20 per-seed pass (60%, aggregate F5′=0.00917) — the first per-seed robust Living Control in the PHILIA series. Key empirical law: correlation in PHILIA is phase-limited rather than magnitude-limited. The slow channel is the primary energy carrier for F5′ amplification — the dominant contributor whose amplification simultaneously raises both w_std and |corr| without destabilizing F2. All experiments executed locally on AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, RTX 4080 SUPER 16GB, DDR5 32GB. No AI-generated or proxy values used. Trinity AI Research Team | 실측이 생명, 증명이 아닌 기술. — PHILIA OS | 0∞1∞0.5∞
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: