Key result
Automated clinician alerts improve timely evaluation and valve intervention for significant valvular heart disease.
Why the study?
Severe AS and MR are frequently undertreated with persistent disparities despite effective valve therapies, and the impact of automated electronic clinician notification alerts on improving evaluation and treatment is unknown.
Does an automated electronic clinician notification (ECN) alert improve timely evaluation and treatment in patients with significant aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation?
RCT
1:1
Yes
Does an automated electronic clinician notification (ECN) alert improve timely evaluation and treatment in patients with significant aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated electronic health record alerts for clinicians ordering echocardiograms can successfully improve timely, guideline-directed evaluation and intervention for patients with severe valvular heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are frequently undertreated and characterized by persistent sex, racial and ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities despite effective valve therapies. Whether automated electronic clinician notification (ECN) alerts improve the evaluation and treatment of AS and MR across health systems is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ECN alerts improve guideline-directed evaluation and treatment of significant AS and MR across multiple health systems. METHODS: ALERT is a multisystem, cluster-randomized clinical trial including clinicians ordering echocardiograms across 5 U.S. health systems encompassing 35 hospitals between August 2024 and September 2025. Clinicians were randomized 1:1 to receive an ECN alert identifying significant AS or MR with accompanying care recommendations or to no alert with usual care. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of time to surgical or transcatheter valve intervention, followed by time to multidisciplinary heart team clinic evaluation within 90 days, analyzed using the stratified win-ratio method. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the composite. RESULTS: > 0.100 for all) and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results across modified intention-to-treat, intention-to-treat, and per-protocol populations. CONCLUSIONS: In this multisystem cluster randomized trial, automated ECN alerts improved timely guideline-directed evaluation and valve intervention for clinically significant AS and MR. These findings suggest that electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support may represent a scalable strategy to reduce undertreatment and improve access to specialized valve care. (Addressing Under-treatment and Health Equity in AS and MR Using an Integrated EHR Platform; NCT06099665).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batchelor et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation. Automated electronic clinician notification (ECN) alerts vs. No alert with usual care was evaluated on Hierarchical composite of time to surgical or transcatheter valve intervention, followed by time to multidisciplinary heart team clinic evaluation within 90 days. Automated electronic clinician notification alerts improved timely guideline-directed evaluation and valve intervention for clinically significant aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation within 90 days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: