Key result
Global CHD birth prevalence rises ~15-fold over recent decades to 9.1 per 1,000 live births.
Why the study?
Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide and over time is suggested to vary, but a complete overview was missing.
Systematic Review (n=24,091,867)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 0.6%
The reported birth prevalence of congenital heart disease has increased substantially over time to 9.1 per 1,000 live births after 1995, with significant geographical variations.
Informs global CHD resource planning for clinicians; leaves open whether improved diagnostics or true incidence drove the rise.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) accounts for nearly one-third of all major congenital anomalies. CHD birth prevalence worldwide and over time is suggested to vary; however, a complete overview is missing. This systematic review included 114 papers, comprising a total study population of 24,091,867 live births with CHD identified in 164,396 individuals. Birth prevalence of total CHD and the 8 most common subtypes were pooled in 5-year time periods since 1930 and in continent and income groups since 1970 using the inverse variance method. Reported total CHD birth prevalence increased substantially over time, from 0.6 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4 to 0.8) in 1930 to 1934 to 9.1 per 1,000 live births (95% CI: 9.0 to 9.2) after 1995. Over the last 15 years, stabilization occurred, corresponding to 1.35 million newborns with CHD every year. Significant geographical differences were found. Asia reported the highest CHD birth prevalence, with 9.3 per 1,000 live births (95% CI: 8.9 to 9.7), with relatively more pulmonary outflow obstructions and fewer left ventricular outflow tract obstructions. Reported total CHD birth prevalence in Europe was significantly higher than in North America (8.2 per 1,000 live births [95% CI: 8.1 to 8.3] vs. 6.9 per 1,000 live births [95% CI: 6.7 to 7.1]; p < 0.001). Access to health care is still limited in many parts of the world, as are diagnostic facilities, probably accounting for differences in reported birth prevalence between high- and low-income countries. Observed differences may also be of genetic, environmental, socioeconomical, or ethnic origin, and there needs to be further investigation to tailor the management of this global health problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linde et al. (2011) conducted a systematic review in Congenital heart disease (n=24,091,867). Time period (after 1995) vs. Time period (1930-1934) was evaluated on Total CHD birth prevalence per 1,000 live births. Reported worldwide birth prevalence of congenital heart disease increased substantially from 0.6 per 1,000 live births in 1930-1934 to 9.1 per 1,000 live births after 1995.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: