Key result
Accelerated RAS and beta-blocker up-titration cuts cardiac hospitalization or death ~65% in diabetics with elevated NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
Few clinical trials have successfully demonstrated prevention of cardiac events in diabetes, potentially due to inaccurate patient selection, and NT-proBNP had not been assessed in this context.
Does intensified up-titration of RAS antagonists and beta-blockers reduce hospitalization or death due to cardiac disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, elevated NT-proBNP, and no history of cardiac disease?
Population
300 patients with type 2 diabetes and NT-proBNP >125 pg/ml free of cardiac disease
Comparison
Intensified RAS antagonist and beta-blocker up-titration vs usual care at diabetes care units
Design
Randomized controlled trial
Follow-up
2 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports NT-proBNP-guided RAS/beta-blocker up-titration in high-risk diabetics; provides first direct RCT evidence for primary prevention.
RCT (n=300)
Yes
Does intensified up-titration of RAS antagonists and beta-blockers reduce hospitalization or death due to cardiac disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, elevated NT-proBNP, and no history of cardiac disease?
Effect estimate: HR 0.351 (95% CI 0.127 to 0.975)
p-value: p=0.044
NT-proBNP-guided up-titration of RAS antagonists and beta-blockers significantly reduced cardiac events in high-risk diabetic patients without prior cardiac disease.
Huelsmann et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes with elevated NT-proBNP but free of cardiac disease (n=300). Up-titration of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists and beta-blockers vs. Standard care at diabetes care units was evaluated on Hospitalization/death due to cardiac disease after 2 years (HR 0.351, 95% CI 0.127 to 0.975, p=0.044). Accelerated up-titration of RAS antagonists and beta-blockers significantly reduced hospitalization or death due to cardiac disease in diabetic patients with elevated NT-proBNP (HR 0.351; 95% CI 0.127-0.975; p=0.044).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: