Key result
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation linked to substantially lower VT burden and ICD shocks with few treatment-related SAEs.
Why the study?
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) reduce sustained VT episode burden in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia?
Cohort (n=193)
Yes
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) reduce sustained VT episode burden in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia?
Effect estimate: 80% reduction
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is associated with a substantial reduction in ventricular tachycardia burden and ICD shocks with an acceptable safety profile in patients with refractory VT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hypothesis-generating for STAR in refractory VT; randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly used for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), yet prospective multicentre outcome data remain limited. Here, the planned interim analysis of the prospective Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary (STOPSTORM) registry is reported. METHODS: STOPSTORM is a European prospective, international, multicentre registry of patients treated with STAR. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in sustained VT episode burden comparing the 6 months before versus the 6 months after STAR. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related. Overall survival was assessed using time-to-event methods. RESULTS: Across 28 centres, 193 patients were included (mean age 68±9 years; 88% male; 53% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Median follow-up was 19 months. Among 107 evaluable patients with ≥6-month follow-up, the median VT episode burden was reduced by 80% after STAR. Among patients surviving ≥6 months, 72% were free from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. In the full cohort, 12 SAEs were adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related, including pericardial effusion, coronary events, and early post-treatment ventricular arrhythmia. Overall survival probability was 77% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest prospective multicentre cohort reported to date, STAR was associated with a substantial reduction in VT burden and ICD shocks, with a low frequency of possibly or probably treatment-related SAEs.
Pol et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Refractory ventricular tachycardia (n=193). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) vs. 6 months prior to STAR (within-patient comparison) was evaluated on Change in sustained VT episode burden comparing the 6 months before versus the 6 months after STAR (80% reduction). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for refractory ventricular tachycardia was associated with an 80% median reduction in VT episode burden and a 77% overall survival probability at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: