Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) reduced median ventricular tachycardia episode burden by 80% compared to the 6 months prior to treatment.
Cohort (n=193)
Yes
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) reduce sustained VT episode burden in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia?
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation is associated with a substantial reduction in VT burden and ICD shocks with a low frequency of treatment-related serious adverse events in patients with refractory VT.
Effect estimate: 80% reduction
Background And Aims Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly used for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), yet prospective multicentre outcome data remain limited. Here, the planned interim analysis of the prospective Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary (STOPSTORM) registry is reported.Methods STOPSTORM is a European prospective, international, multicentre registry of patients treated with STAR. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in sustained VT episode burden comparing the 6 months before versus the 6 months after STAR. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related. Overall survival was assessed using time-to-event methods.Results Across 28 centres, 193 patients were included (mean age 68±9 years; 88% male; 53% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Median follow-up was 19 months. Among 107 evaluable patients with ≥6-month follow-up, the median VT episode burden was reduced by 80% after STAR. Among patients surviving ≥6 months, 72% were free from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. In the full cohort, 12 SAEs were adjudicated as possibly or probably treatment-related, including pericardial effusion, coronary events, and early post-treatment ventricular arrhythmia. Overall survival probability was 77% at 12 months.Conclusions In the largest prospective multicentre cohort reported to date, STAR was associated with a substantial reduction in VT burden and ICD shocks, with a low frequency of possibly or probably treatment-related SAEs.
Pol 외 (Mon,)은 무반응성 심실빈맥(n=193)에서 코호트를 수행했습니다. 정위성 부정맥 방사선 절제술(STAR) 대 사전 치료 기준(6개월 이전)이 STAR 이전 6개월과 STAR 이후 6개월의 지속적인 VT 에피소드 부담의 변화를 평가했습니다(80% 감소). 정위성 부정맥 방사선 절제술(STAR)은 치료 이전 6개월에 비해 중앙값 심실빈맥 에피소드 부담을 80% 감소시켰습니다.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: