Research investigates displacement mechanisms and recovery optimization in carbonate reservoirs, suggesting strategies for enhanced oil recovery.
Carbonate reservoirs exhibit complex combinations of pores, fractures, and vugs, and their strong heterogeneity makes pore-scale displacement mechanisms and recovery enhancement difficult to predict. In this study, six microfluidic glass-etched models representative of pore-type, vuggy, and fracture-pore carbonate reservoirs were designed from cast thin sections of the S oilfield. Experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of different factors on microscopic displacement behavior and residual-oil distribution. The results show that microscopic residual oil in carbonate reservoirs mainly occurs as film flow, droplet flow, columnar flow, multi-pore flow, and cluster flow, with cluster flow dominating the late stage of development in all model types. Under waterflooding, pore-type reservoirs exhibit the most uniform sweep and the highest recovery factor (44.26%), whereas vuggy reservoirs readily develop preferential flow channels and show the lowest recovery factor (41.58%). For fracture-pore reservoirs, injection perpendicular to the fracture provides the best performance, and wider or denser fractures improve displacement efficiency. Compared with gas flooding, waterflooding increases recovery by 10.48% in pore-type reservoirs and by 16.44% in fracture-type reservoirs. High-rate waterflooding and mid-stage flow diversion further improve recovery by 9.05–10.87% and 17.12–19.63%, respectively. These results provide pore-scale evidence for optimizing development strategies for carbonate reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: