PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Macromolecular Materials and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Tensile Properties of 3D‐Printed Porous Bouligand Structured Polymer Plates

View Full Paper
PPPraveenkumar Subhash PatilEMEdward D. McCarthyPAParvez Alam

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the tensile properties of 3D-printed porous Bouligand-structured polymers inspired by natural designs.
  • Samples created using stereolithography from Tough 2000 resin at varying pitch angles and fiber spacings.
  • Tensile tests conducted according to ASTM D638-22 and complemented with finite element analysis to assess stress distributions.
  • Ashby charts used to compare specific properties with polymer foams and fiber-reinforced composites.
  • Tensile modulus and strength peak at a pitch angle of 30, with a partial recovery at 90 degrees.
  • Reduction in fiber spacing enhances strength by 35%-40%.
  • PBSPs show significant efficiency with 2-10 times higher stiffness and 10-50 times higher strength than conventional polymer foams.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The unique architectures of natural Bouligands enable low‐density materials to achieve high strength and toughness. This paper concerns the tensile properties of porous Bouligand‐structured polymers (PBSP) inspired from the dactyl plunger of snapping shrimps. Samples were stereolithographically printed from Tough 2000 resin with pitch angles ranging from 10–90 and fiber spacings of 0.5–1.25 mm, producing porosities of 0.29–0.48 and apparent densities of 0.56–0.78 g/. Tensile tests were conducted following ASTM D638‐22 and were complemented by finite element analysis as a means of analyzing deformations against stress distributions. Tensile modulus and strength both vary non‐monotonically with pitch angle, peaking at 30 and partially recovering at 90, while reduced fiber spacing (0.5 mm) provides a consistent improvement in load transfer, delivering 35%–40% higher strength than highly porous (1.25 mm) counterparts. Additionally, the specific properties show respectable stiffness‐to‐weight and strength‐to‐weight efficiency with a near‐linear scaling between specific modulus and strength. Ashby charts reveal that PBSPs fill a low‐density band in which they simultaneously exhibit 2–10 higher stiffness and 10–50 higher strength than typical polymeric foams and approach the specific performance of lightweight fiber‐reinforced composites. The hybrid experimental‐numerical study presented here establishes a foundation for the optimization of tensile properties in PBSPs, and demonstrates the tunability of mechanical behavior through geometric design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb2285696592c86ecf22https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.70218
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper