PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Animals1 citationsOpen Access

Reducing Protein Content with and Without Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Supplementation in the Diet of Dairy Cow: Effects on Nitrogen Use, Digestibility, and Rumen Microbial Protein

View Full Paper
NSNizar SalahBGBrigitte GestesPLPauline Ly

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how reducing protein in dairy cow diets affects nitrogen use and digestion, particularly with a yeast probiotic.
  • Used a 3 × 3 Latin square design with six cows over multiple diet periods.
  • Diet groups included a control with 16.5 CP%, a lower protein diet without and one with 5 g/cow/day of Actisaf SC 47.
  • Measured nitrogen intake, urinary nitrogen, fecal nitrogen, and digestibility across diets.
  • Lowered protein intake significantly decreased nitrogen intake, especially with Actisaf supplementation.
  • Fecal nitrogen was lower in the Actisaf group compared to the control, while urinary nitrogen tended to decrease with Actisaf.
  • Supplementation increased nitrogen use efficiency and improved fiber digestibility without affecting overall organic matter digestibility.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of lowering crude protein (CP) levels in the diet of dairy cows alone or in combination with a yeast probiotic on nitrogen utilization, digestion, and rumen microbial protein synthesis. In total, six cows were included in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Each study period consisted of 23 days of diet adaptation and 5 days for sampling and data collection. Cows were randomly assigned to one of the three diets according to protein level and supplementation: control diet with 16.5 CP%DM (CTR), a diet with 14.5 CP%DM without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation (LCP), and a diet with 14.5 CP%DM with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 g/cow/day (LCPActisaf). Reducing protein content from 16.5 to 14.5 CP%DM alone or in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 significantly reduced nitrogen intake. Regarding fecal nitrogen (FN), no difference was observed between the CTR and LCP groups. However, FN was significantly lower in the LCPActisaf group compared with that of the CTR group. There was a tendency for lower FN in the LCPActisaf group compared with the LCP group. Compared with CTR, urinary nitrogen (UN) was not impacted by LCP but tended to decrease with LCPActisaf (p = 0.1). Compared with CTR and LCP, supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) (p < 0.05). A tendency for higher NUE was observed in the LCP group compared with the CTR group (p = 0.07). Crude protein digestibility was similar between the CTR and LCP groups and tended to increase with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation. Compared with CTR, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility was not impacted by LCP but increased by LCPActisaf (p = 0.05); LCPActisaf did not impact NDF digestibility compared with LCP. Organic matter (OM) digestibility was similar among treatments. Although there was no difference between the three groups on rumen microbial protein synthesis (RMP), supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 increased RMP. Reducing protein content in combination with Actisaf Sc 47 appears to be a good strategy, enabling both the environmental footprint linked to nitrogen losses to be reduced, and fiber digestibility and rumen microbial protein synthesis to increase.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb6285696592c86ed0c0https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081277
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper