Key result
CD40/CD40L drives atherothrombosis through inflammation and thrombosis, but therapeutic targeting remains unproven.
Why the study?
The exact mechanisms linking the CD40/CD40L system and soluble CD40 ligand with atherothrombosis remain a topic of intensive research.
This review highlights the pathophysiological mechanisms of the CD40/CD40L system in atherothrombosis and acute coronary syndromes, emphasizing its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target.
The role of CD40/CD40 ligand (CD40L) in atherothrombosis is now widely accepted. However, the exact mechanisms linking the CD40/CD40L system and the soluble form of CD40 ligand (sCD40L) with atherothrombosis are currently a topic of intensive research. CD40L and sCD40L belong to the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, and they are molecules with a dual prothrombotic and proinflammatory role. They are expressed in a variety of tissues such as the immune system (in both B and T cells), the vascular wall, and activated platelets. Soluble CD40L has multiple autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine actions, and it may trigger key mechanisms participating in atherothrombosis. CD40/CD40L may participate in the development of coronary atherosclerosis and the triggering of acute coronary syndromes, while sCD40L seems to have a prognostic role not only in subjects with advanced atherosclerosis but also in the general population. Although conventional cardiovascular medication such as antiplatelet therapy, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and many others have been shown to reduce both sCD40L and cardiovascular risk, it is still unclear whether specific treatments targeting the CD40/CD40L system will prove to be beneficial against atherothrombosis in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antoniades et al. (2009) conducted a review in Atherothrombosis. CD40/CD40 ligand system was evaluated. The CD40/CD40 ligand system plays a dual prothrombotic and proinflammatory role in atherothrombosis, though the benefit of specific targeted treatments remains unclear.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: