This evaluation investigates phosphoproteomic coverage in a human cell line and bacteria, indicating optimal workflows for low phosphorylation samples.
Recent advancements in data-independent acquisition (DIA) workflows have greatly increased the depth and throughput of mass spectrometry-based proteomics. However, many of these advancements remain undercharacterized for phosphoproteomics, particularly in bacteria that have fewer protein phosphorylation events. We evaluated the impact of instrument/gradient length (Orbitrap Astral, 15 min; Orbitrap Exploris, 90 min), analysis tools (DIA-NN 1.9.2, DIA-NN 2.3, FragPipe, Spectronaut), and library search strategies (spectral-library versus library-free) on phosphoproteomic coverage and quantification in a human cell line and bacterial lysate. The 15 min Astral analysis identified similar numbers of phosphopeptides compared to a 90 min Exploris acquisition method across all analysis tools, demonstrating a substantial advantage in throughput. Within the Astral workflow, Spectronaut provided the highest phosphoproteome coverage, whereas DIA-NN 1.9.2, DIA-NN 2.3, and FragPipe exhibited less quantitative variation. We compared library-free and spectral-library search strategies using the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv strain. We observed greater phosphopeptide identifications yet different phosphopeptide profiles via library-free searches in comparison to spectral-library searches. When comparing Mtb harvested at different growth phases, phosphosite fold-changes were consistent, whereas statistical significance varied between tools. This work can be informative for workflow selection in DIA phosphoproteomics studies, especially for biological samples with low phosphorylation frequencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: