PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026European Journal of Political ResearchOpen Access

Tying the hands of coalition partners in international negotiations: Public dissent and constraining powers

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PRPit Rieger

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis explores how sidelined coalition parties use public dissent to influence negotiations, suggesting strategic implications.

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how sidelined coalition parties use public dissent in international negotiations to influence outcomes.
  • Formal modeling to derive implications of dissent strategies
  • Empirical analysis of parliamentary roll call votes in the European Union from 2004 to 2019
  • Focus on the interaction of coalition dynamics and negotiation outcomes
  • Public dissent is used strategically by sidelined coalition partners to constrain negotiating ministers.
  • Dissent aligns with the predictions of the formal model, showing effectiveness in influencing negotiations.
  • The analysis provides insights into coalition policymaking dynamics in international contexts.

Cite This Study

Pit Rieger (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb099a553a5433e34b40a2https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526101121
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share