Key result
Extreme chest monitor heart rate spikes are ~3-fold more common in athletes with documented arrhythmias.
Why the study?
The prevalence, morphology, and clinical relevance of transient, extreme heart rate spikes on heart rate monitors in endurance athletes had not been evaluated.
Do extreme heart rate spikes on chest-strap heart rate monitors in endurance athletes correlate with clinically documented arrhythmias?
Observational (n=251)
Do extreme heart rate spikes on chest-strap heart rate monitors in endurance athletes correlate with clinically documented arrhythmias?
Extreme heart rate spikes with paroxysmal morphology on chest-strap monitors in athletes are strongly associated with clinically documented arrhythmias and should prompt clinical work-up rather than being dismissed as artifacts.
Extreme HR spikes on HRMs may flag arrhythmia in endurance athletes; leaves open their prognostic value pending prospective validation.
Aims Evaluate the prevalence, morphology, and clinical relevance of transient, extreme heart rate (HR) spikes on heart rate monitors (HRMs) in endurance athletes. Methods HRM training sessions (n=57,282) from 251 endurance athletes (167 Pro@Heart; 84 Master@Heart), were analysed. Individual physiological maximal HR (HRmaxTan) was determined using the kernel density of peak HR values. Extreme HR events were defined as sessions exceeding this limit (HRmaxHRM). Tracings were visually classified; paroxysmal spikes were considered to be potential tachyarrhythmia. Incidence was estimated with Kaplan–Meier analysis. Demographic, training, and device predictors were tested with a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM). Clinical and Holter data were reviewed for arrhythmia documentation. Results Extreme HR values occurred in 1.0% of sessions across 133 athletes (53.0%). Paroxysmal spikes represented 28.1% of cases, occurred in 0.27% of sessions and 23.9% of athletes, cumulative incidence was 33.8% (95% CI 26.1–41.4%) after 291 sessions. The GLMM identified no significant predictors. Paroxysmal spikes were observed in 71.4% of athletes (10/14) with arrhythmia versus 21.1% without (50/237) (p<0.001). Nearly all HRmaxHRM spikes preceded Holter-documented arrhythmias. Conclusion Many characteristics point to true arrhythmias as the cause of HRmaxHRM recordings with paroxysmal spike morphology: they are rare, do not occur randomly across athletes, and cosegregate with clinically documented arrhythmias. Whether they represent malignant arrhythmias or an extreme athletic cardiac phenotype remains to be determined and is relevant to the role of HRMs as surveillance tools. HRmaxHRM tracings with spike morphology should not be dismissed as artefact but require work-up to determine clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buyck et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Endurance athletes (n=251). Chest-strap heart rate monitors was evaluated on Paroxysmal extreme heart rate spikes in athletes with vs without documented arrhythmia (p=<0.001). Paroxysmal extreme heart rate spikes on chest-strap monitors occurred in 71.4% of athletes with documented arrhythmias versus 21.1% without (p<0.001), suggesting they represent true arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: