Quantifies light hydrocarbon loss in shale oil, suggesting a new restoration model for accurate evaluations.
Light hydrocarbons in shale oil readily volatilize during conventional coring, surface handling, storage, and laboratory preparation. The resulting evaporative loss causes systematic underestimation of Rock-Eval S1 peak (free hydrocarbons measured by programmed pyrolysis), which can bias oil-bearing evaluation, sweet-spot delineation, and resource assessment. Here we investigate Chang 73 lacustrine shale oil in the Ordos Basin (China) using frozen cores recovered by pressure-retained coring from four wells. Time-series Rock-Eval pyrolysis and thermal desorption–gas chromatography (TD–GC) were used to quantify the magnitude, temporal evolution, and practical equilibrium time of light-hydrocarbon loss and to establish a practical restoration model. S1 decreases with storage time and exhibits a clear two-stage behavior. Shale shows a rapid-loss stage during 0–90 days, followed by a practical equilibrium stage after 90 days (S1 change less than 5%). Sandstone interbeds lose light hydrocarbons faster and more completely, reaching practical equilibrium after 60 days. TD–GC indicates that the lost fraction is dominated by n-alkane components lighter than C13, with gaseous hydrocarbons showing the greatest depletion; medium and heavy fractions decrease modestly. Loss is coupled with progressive desorption from kerogen and clays, leading to enrichment of heavier components in the residual free hydrocarbons and a shift of the modal carbon number toward higher values. At the shale equilibrium time, total organic carbon (TOC) and vitrinite reflectance (Ro) jointly control the restoration factor K. We propose a two-parameter restoration model: K = (0.4024·ln (TOC) + 0.821)·(0.652·Ro + 0.4292). Applying the model to more than 50 conventionally cored wells reveals that the Qingyang–Zhengning area in the southwestern basin is the principal enrichment zone of original free hydrocarbons, followed by the Jiyuan area in the north and the Huachi area in the central basin, whereas the eastern basin is relatively depleted. The workflow provides a robust and transferable approach for correcting S1 and improving shale-oil evaluation in lacustrine systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: