Coordinated pricing mitigates grid stress in bidirectional electric vehicles, suggesting economic benefits.
This paper presents an integrated techno–economic framework for coordinated grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-grid (G2V–V2G) operation in unbalanced distribution networks. A hardware-compatible bidirectional charger with nested AC/DC and DC/DC control loops, together with a rule-based energy management system (EMS), enables seamless mode transitions while enforcing state-of-charge (SoC) and network constraints. A probabilistic Monte Carlo study on the IEEE 13-bus feeder shows that uncoordinated G2V charging induces adverse grid impacts such as voltage stress, line-ampacity violations, and transformer overloading, whereas EMS-driven V2G support improves voltage by 2–4%, reduces line loading by 15–25%, and lowers transformer stress by up to 10%. To align these technical benefits with economic incentives, a bi-level Stackelberg model is formulated where the utility updates locational energy prices based on combined voltage, line ampacity, transformer loading stress indices and EVs choose profit-maximizing nodes, modes and power levels. The interaction converges to a Stackelberg equilibrium with a clear win–win situation; the feeder’s average locational energy price falls entirely within the win–win region, yielding positive per-session profits for both the EV (≈$0.80) and the utility (≈$0.48) while reducing feeder stress. These results demonstrate that stress-aware locational pricing, combined with detailed converter-level control provides a technically robust and economically sustainable pathway for large-scale EV integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: