Key result
LVEF ≤15% is linked to ~77% higher mortality versus 36-45%, with survival plateauing above this threshold.
Why the study?
Although LVEF is an accepted prognostic indicator in HF patients, its relationship with mortality across the full spectrum of LVEF is incompletely understood.
Observational (n=7,788)
Effect estimate: HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.48 to 2.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 51.7% vs 25.6%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
In stable heart failure patients, mortality risk decreases linearly as LVEF increases up to 45%, but plateaus at higher ejection fractions.
Caution advised assuming mortality benefit beyond LVEF 45% in stable HF; leaves open causality, mechanisms, and interventional targets in higher EF groups.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in stable outpatients with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Although LVEF is an accepted prognostic indicator of prognosis in HF patients, the relationship of LVEF and mortality across the full spectrum of LVEF is incompletely understood. METHODS: We examined the association of LVEF and outcomes among 7,788 stable HF patients enrolled in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. RESULTS: During mean follow-up of 37 months, mortality was substantial in all LVEF groups (range, LVEF <or= 15%, 51.7%, LVEF > 55%, 23.5%). Among patients with LVEF <or= 45%, mortality decreased in a near linear fashion across successively higher LVEF groups (LVEF < 15%, 51.7%; LVEF 36% to 45%, 25.6%; p < 0.0001). This association was present after multivariable adjustment, although the magnitude of this associated risk was reduced (LVEF <or= 15%: hazard ratio [HR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 2.11; LVEF 16% to 25%: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.61; LVEF 26% to 35%: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.28; LVEF 36% to 45%: referent). In contrast, mortality rates were comparable among patients with LVEF > 45% both before (LVEF 46% to 55%: 23.3%; LVEF > 55%: 23.5%; p = 0.25), and after multivariable adjustment (LVEF 46% to 55%: HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; LVEF > 55%: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.09; LVEF 36% to 45%: referent). Patients with lower LVEF were at increased absolute risk of death due to arrhythmia and worsening HF, but these were leading causes of death in all LVEF groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among HF patients in sinus rhythm, higher LVEFs were associated with a linear decrease in mortality up to an LVEF of 45%. However, increases above 45% were not associated with further reductions in mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtis et al. (2003) conducted an observational in stable outpatients with heart failure (n=7,788). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 15% vs. LVEF 36% to 45% was evaluated on mortality (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.11, p=< 0.0001). Higher LVEF in stable heart failure patients was associated with decreased mortality up to 45% (LVEF ≤15% vs 36-45%: HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.48-2.11), but increases above 45% showed no further reductions.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: