The article is devoted to overcoming the decimeter-level limit of positioning accuracy, resulting from inconsistency between the purpose of the national datum GSK-2011 and its underlying theoretical definition. The criteria for the optimal definition of the national datum are formulated in respect to the most cost-effective satisfying of user needs at a time interval of more than 20 years. A definition and a method of implementation of datum prototype, designated GSK-2035, are presented. GSK2035 enables accounting for the physical deformation of the territory, while ensuring the constancy of the coordinates of real estate objects, unambiguous transformation to ITRF at a sub-centimeter accuracy level for the entire territory of Russia with maximum simplicity of transformations. The cartesian coordinates in GSK-2035 and ITRF2020 will be numerically close within 15 years after the introduction of the proposed datum, which makes it optimal for creating a unified cartographic layer and allows it to be used for GNSS navigation with relatively high accuracy even without transformation. In order to achieve the highest accuracy of transformations in GSK-2035, in nearly three quarters of cases in the territory of the Russian Federation, the standard Helmert model with parameters’ rates is sufficient. In other cases, high accuracy is achieved by applying a constant velocity field and local corrections, which are an integral part of GSK-2035. The transformations are fully automated. The introduction of a reference frame with the presented characteristics is a prerequisite for the implementation of a unified high-precision geo-information space and a navigation field of the corresponding accuracy throughout the territory of Russia. That would also provide increase in the efficiency of high-precision positioning by one or two orders of magnitude comparing to current procedures of accessing the national datum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. A. Lipatnikov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: